Complainant Demanded Respondent Sell Domain Name or Would Bring UDRP Most UDRP cases are ”run of the mill” cases that consist mainly of very similar fact patterns which disclose a clear case of cybersquatting. A significant minority however, are laden with unique circumstances, challenging legal questions, or conflicting evidence. Some such complicated or unique cases may be resolvable despite the …
Panel: “Height of Irony” for Complainant to Accuse Respondent of Typosquatting – vol 5.42
Panel: “Height of Irony” for Complainant to Accuse Respondent of Typosquatting When Respondent Owned Properly Spelled Domain, Prescriptive[.com] Congratulations to the Panel for its solid and clear-eyed rejection of a baseless claim. Also, congratulations to the Respondent’s counsel (an ICA Member) for his successful defense. It is a shame however, that this case even needed to be defended. As the …
Daniel Law Steps Down from the ICA Board After Nearly 2 Decades
As part of this year’s Board of Directors election, the ICA would like to recognize and thank Daniel Law, who has stepped down from the ICA Board after nearly two decades of dedicated service, including time as Interim Executive Director. Daniel has been a key contributor to the ICA’s growth and evolution, providing steady leadership and thoughtful guidance throughout his …
Behind the ICA Board: Who Serves and How They Get There
How the ICA Board Works Ever wondered how members of the Internet Commerce Association’s Board are chosen, or how the Board itself is structured? As the group guiding our advocacy, events, and strategic direction, the Board plays a vital role in shaping the ICA’s work on behalf of the domain investment community. Here’s a quick look at how it all …
Respondent Physician and Investor Provided “Plausible Explanation” For Domain Name Registration and Use – vol. 5.41
COURT UPDATE: Lawsuit Filed by Complainant After UDRP on FyreFestival.com Dismissed. In our September 24, 2025 UDRP Digest we reported on this UDRP decision (See: “Did the Panel Unjustly Deprive the Complainant of a Transfer?”. ICA General Counsel, Zak Muscovitch, commented that “in dismissing what appears to be a strong and clear case, the Panel has in my view, unfortunately …
Nat Cohen and Ryan McKegney Re-Elected to the ICA Board of Directors
We’re happy to share that Nat Cohen and Ryan McKegney have been re-elected to serve on ICA’s Board of Directors. This will be Ryan’s second year on the Board, and in just his first year he’s already made a big impact, stepping into a leadership role on the Executive Committee and taking on the position of Vice Treasurer. Ryan’s insight …
Panel: No ‘Per se Legal Obligation’ Under the Policy to Conduct a Trademark Search – vol 5.40
Panel: No ‘Per se Legal Obligation’ Under the Policy to Conduct a Trademark Search This case is notable for how the Panel took an appropriately nuanced view of the utility of conducting a trademark search. The Panel noted that “there is not a per se legal obligation under the Policy to conduct a search of trademark office databases as a …
Registration of “Stamps .com” Mark Does Not Confer an Exclusive Right to the Stand-Alone Term “Stamps” – vol 5.39
Registration of “Stamps .com” Mark Does Not Confer an Exclusive Right to the Stand-Alone Term “Stamps” This case will be of special interest for those who have wondered how the UDRP will consider the U.S. Supreme Court’s Booking.com decision. The ICA filed an amicus brief in the Booking.com case through its very able counsel, David Weslow of Wiley and afterwards …
Welcome Global Tech Leader Squarespace as ICA’s Newest Platinum Member
We’re proud to announce that Squarespace, a global leader in the digital presence industry, has joined the Internet Commerce Association (ICA) as a Platinum Member. Squarespace’s membership marks a significant milestone for the ICA and the broader domain name community. As one of the world’s leading domain registrars, Squarespace brings the voice of owners of over 13 million domains—comprising a …
Did the Panel Unjustly Deprive the Complainant of a Transfer? – vol. 5.38
Did the Panel Unjustly Deprive the Complainant of a Transfer? The Panel’s decision is confounding to me. Despite a lengthy and complex decision, the facts to me appear rather simple. The Complainant had a very well-known common law trademark for a music festival located in the Bahamas which preexisted the Respondent’s registration of the Domain Name. The Respondent used the …

